|

The
choices of the
Filipino veterans

WHILE there are dozens of Filipino World War II veterans
groups all over the United States, the leadership of the national
organizations directing the agenda of the Filipino veterans
are non-veterans affiliated with the National Federation of
Filipino American Associations (NaFFAA), the National Network
for Veterans Equity (NNVE) and the Filipino Civil Rights Advocates
(FilCRA).
Together, these national groups are supporting "solely
and exclusively" HR 677, a bill currently pending in
the US House of Representatives that would amend the 1946
Rescission Act which stripped Filipino World War II soldiers
of their U.S. veterans status. California Representatives
Randy Cunningham (R) and Bob Filner (D) are the main sponsors
of this bill.
In the next month, NaFFAA's 12 regions will be mobilizing
their local chapters and affiliates in a coordinated campaign
to sign up more sponsors to HR 677 which, to date, has already
garnered close to 60 supporters in the House. NaFFAA members
will join other organizations in two days of lobbying in Capitol
Hill from May 3-4.
There is, however, one national organization involved in
the Filipino veterans campaign that is actually led by Filipino
WW II veterans -- the American Coalition for the Filipino
Veterans (ACFV).
This coalition was founded in 1995 by Patrick Ganio Sr.,
83, a decorated Purple Heart veteran of Bataan and Corregidor,
and Guillermo Rumingan, 78, a disabled former Philippine Scout.
Ganio immigrated to the US in the 1980s after he was petitioned
by his daughter, a US citizen who immigrated to the US as
a registered nurse. Though a public school teacher in the
Philippines, Ganio found a job in the U.S. as a property manager
of a Tudor apartment building on Embassy Row in Washington,
DC.
Rumingan immigrated to the US in the 1970s, initially as
an overstaying tourist (TNT), and who found a job as a taxi
driver and later as a chauffeur for an Arab ambassador.
Using Ganio's one-bedroom apartment as their base, the two
wartime comrades and their fellow veterans began a lobbying
effort in the 1980s, where they met individually with members
of the US Congress and with White House officials to persuade
them to support the granting of benefits to Filipino WW II
veterans. It was in his small apartment that Ganio played
host to a succession of Philippine Congressmen who wanted
updates on their lobbying efforts.
Ganio and Rumingan and their band of brothers and sisters
achieved their first major victory in November 1990 when Congress
passed the 1990 Immigration Act which granted US citizenship
to Filipino WWII veterans. Because of his lobbying efforts,
Ganio was invited to attend the White House ceremony where
President George H. Bush signed the bill into law.
Though I had heard of them for years, I met Ganio and Rumingan
for the first time in February of 1997 when I joined them
in what was for them a regular lobbying day, trudging through
the halls of Congress to personally lobby senators and representatives.
On that day, we were accompanied by Eric Lachica, the son
of a WWII veteran, who had quit his job working for a non-profit
community organization in Maryland in 1996 to work with Patrick
and Guillermo in the ACFV.
On the day I joined them in 1997, we met with Representative
Bob Filner, the main sponsor of the Filipino Veterans Equity
Bill in the US Congress, and with Marie Blanco, the legislative
aide of Senator Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), himself a WWII veteran
who has been the most dependable Senate supporter of the Filipino
veterans. Marie had been quietly working behind the scenes
to garner the support of the legislative aides of other Senators
and Representatives to support the Filipino veterans.
Marie told us that members of the US Congress were reluctant
to support the Filipino Veterans Equity Bill because of the
money involved. Back then, Marie's estimate was that it would
cost about 750 million dollars a year to finance the veterans
equity bill which would then have provided a 700-dollar-a-month
pension to about 60,000 Filipino veterans who were still alive
then.
Marie informed us that it was Senator Inouye's advice that
the Filipino veterans adopt a step-by-step approach to securing
veterans benefits. This would mean lobbying for benefits that
were practical and financially feasible like burial benefits,
health care benefits, SSI benefits, war-related injury benefits
and disability pension benefits. Taken individually, each
of these benefits had a low price tag and was winnable, she
said.
Following Senator Inouye's advice, Ganio and Rumingan directed
their efforts to lobbying for those individual benefits. And
one by one, the veterans gained their benefits.
In 1999, the SSI Special Veterans Bill passed giving Filipino
American WWII veterans 75 percent of the SSI benefits they
were receiving in the US when they returned to the Philippines.
This 400-dollar-a-month benefit in Philippine pesos amounted
to about 20,000 pesos, the average monthly salary of a college
professor in the Philippines.
In 2000, the Full Service Connected Compensation Benefit
Law was passed which raised war-related compensation for Filipino
veterans from half to full benefits. Also, in the same year,
the Burial Benefits Law passed which allowed Filipino-American
WWII veterans to be buried in national veterans cemeteries.
In 2002, the veterans succeeded in securing the restoration
of the one-million-dollar annual VA Grant-in-Aid to the Philippine
Veterans Medical Center.
In 2003, the veterans secured passage of the Veterans HealthCare
Act which restored full VA medical benefits to US-based Filipino
WWII veterans, a package which amounted to about 19.6 million
dollars a year.
While Ganio was invited by the first President Bush to witness
the White House signing of the Filipino Veterans Naturalization
Bill in 1990, Rumingan was similarly honored to be invited
by the second President Bush to witness the Oval Office signing
into law of HR 2297, the Veterans HealthCare Act, on December
16, 2003.
This law was particularly meaningful to Rumingan as it finally
extended to him the full war service compensation benefits
for the tuberculosis that nearly killed him fifty years ago
that had been denied him until then.
There are now only 29,350 Filipino WWII veterans who are
still alive, generally in their late 70s and 80s, according
to the May 14, 2003 news release of the US Department of Veterans
Affairs.
HR 677 would provide these veterans, whether in the Philippines
or in the US, with 800 dollars a month in disability pension.
It is estimated that the total annual cost of this bill would
be 218 million dollars.
But based on their 20-year experience of lobbying in Capitol
Hill, Ganio and Rumingan believe that there is absolutely
no chance that HR 677 would ever be passed by the US Congress
and signed into law by President Bush, especially now with
the huge budget deficit that the US has incurred as a result
of the Iraq quagmire.
Instead, Ganio, Rumingan and their ACFV coalition are backing
Senator Inouye's bill, S. 68, the Filipino Veterans Benefits
Improvement Act, which would provide 800 dollars a month for
US-based veterans and 100 dollars a month for Philippine-based
veterans. The annual cost of this bill would be 22 million
dollars, which Ganio and Rumingan believe is low enough to
be winnable.
They point out that 100 dollars a month in the Philippines
amounts to 5,600 pesos a month, which together with the 5,000
pesos a month they receive from the Philippine government
would make their total monthly income comparable to the average
salary of a public school teacher in the Philippines.
The Philippine government and the Veterans Federation of
the Philippines of Colonel Emmanuel de Ocampo support S. 68
because they also believe that a bird in the hand is better
than two in the bush (or might never come from Bush).
But while this is a practical matter for Ganio and Rumingan
and their veteran comrades in the US and in the Philippines
who support S. 68, it is a matter of principle to the non-veteran
supporters in the NaFFAA, NNVE and FilCRA who fervently believe
that HR 677 is the only bill that should be supported, regardless
of whether it has any hope of passage.
Should the Filipino community only support HR 677 as a matter
of principle or S. 68 as a practical matter? That's the choice
that faces us.
Send comments to rodel50@aol.com.
|