|

Remember
the CalPERS!

AS a call to action, it doesn't quite have the ring or resonance
of "Remember the Alamo!" (or "the Maine!"
or "Pearl Harbor!") perhaps because it appeals to
a higher, more noble sentiment than simply a bloodthirsty
call for revenge.
"Remember the CalPERS!" is an instructive lesson
about what our community can achieve with unity and perseverance,
with inspiration and perspiration. It should be told and retold
to generations of Filipinos in America.
This is especially inspiring for a community used to divisiveness
and failure. So instead of dwelling on the defeats of the
I-Hotel and the airport screeners struggles, and on the frustrating
60-year fight for veterans equity, the community can now draw
inspiration from the showdown at the CalPERS corral.
CalPERS background
CalPERS, the California Public Employees Retirement System,
handles the retirement/health benefits of 1.4 million California
public employees and 2,500 employers. It is the largest US
investment fund with 168 billion dollars in assets of which
2.6 billion dollars is invested in international equity markets
in "emerging economies." Of this amount, CalPERS
invests about 68 million dollars in Philippine corporations.
Through its consultant, Wilshire Associates, CalPERS grades
27 countries according to their political stability, legal
system, market regulations, labor practices, investor protections
and stock trading costs. To merit CalPERS investment, a country
must earn at least two points on a three-point scale.
When the previous minimum grade was 1.5 points, the Philippines
earned a grade of 1.46 in 2002. When the minimum was raised
to 2.0 in 2003, the Philippines' grade had increased to 1.87.
Wilshire Associates gave the Philippines failing grades for
political stability, legal system, market regulations, and
investor protections.
CalPERS to disinvest
At the February 3, 2004 meeting of the CalPERS board investment
committee in Sacramento, California, Wilshire Associates announced
its recommendation to disinvest in the Philippines. At that
meeting, the Philippine government, through Philippine Ambassador
to the US Albert del Rosario, strongly protested the grade
assessments of Wilshire Associates.
At its subsequent February 15 meeting, the CalPERS board gave
the Philippines a 30-day reprieve for the Philippines to provide
Wilshire with additional information to rebut its conclusions.
A meeting of Philippine officials with CalPERS was set for
March 6, which would provide Wilshire enough time to make
any revisions to its grades, in time for the CalPERS March
15 meeting.
But Wilshire Associates had already decided to stick to its
previous conclusion and posted its grade in its website on
March 3, thereby rendering moot whatever the Philippines may
have presented at its March 6 meeting with CalPERS.
Community to the rescue
With one week to go before the March 15 CalPERS board meeting,
with his back against the wall, Ambassador Del Rosario decided
to call on the Filipino-American community to come to the
aid of the Philippines and to attend the March 15 CalPERS
board meeting in Sacramento.
A few days before the meeting, I received a call on my cell
phone from Ambassador Del Rosario who requested me to speak
to the CalPERS board as the lone Filipino-American elected
official in San Francisco. Other community leaders such as
Yolanda Stern of the FilAm Chamber of Commerce and Davis City
Mayor Ruth Uy Asmundsen were similarly invited to speak.
San Francisco Consul General Delia Menez-Rosal mobilized her
entire staff to contact Fil-Am community leaders and to arrange
for buses and food for those willing and able to travel to
Sacramento.
On March 15, over 300 of us showed up at the CalPERS auditorium
for the CalPERS board meeting, taking up most of the seats
in the audience.
False basis for grade
When the agenda item for the Philippine issue came up, Wilshire
Associates director Rosalyn Hewsenian reported that the grade
of the Philippines remained unchanged since the last board
meeting. When she justified her failing grade for the country's
political stability by citing the impeachment of Chief Justice
Hilario Davide Jr., the partisan audience erupted with a torrent
of boos and cries of "False!" "False!"
The chairperson of the board's investment committee, Rob Feckner,
then spoke and expressed his confidence that the Philippines
has been given every opportunity to improve its score but
that there had simply not been enough there to merit maintaining
CalPERS investments in the country. The chairperson of the
CalPERS board, Sean Harrigan, chimed in, echoing Feckner's
comments and reiterating his confidence in Wilshire Associates.
But before a vote could be taken, CalPERS board member and
former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown asked his fellow board
members to refrain from expressing their conclusions until
after they had the opportunity to hear the side of the Philippines.
Board member Charlie Valdes and Robert Carlsen seconded Mayor
Brown's suggestion.
Committee chairperson Feckner, sensing the due process sentiment
of the board, then called on Ambassador Del Rosario to come
forward and make the pitch for the Philippines.
9-4 likely vote
According to board member and California State Controller
Steve Westly, his informal poll of the board sentiment before
the March 15 meeting was nine in favor of accepting Wilshire's
recommendation to disinvest in the Philippines with only four
in opposition.
Ambassador Del Rosario then walked to the table in front of
the board and seated himself in the center with his technical
staff seated to his left and behind him. In the one chair
between himself and Wilshire Director Hewsenian, he seated
me. I had the best seat in the house.
Ambassador Del Rosario then proceeded to provide the board
with a PowerPoint audio-visual presentation of the Philippine
case with emphasis on his exasperating attempts to provide
Wilshire Associates with factual data to counter its previous
negative assessments.
"It's easier to make an appointment with the Queen of
England than with Wilshire Associates!" Ambassador Del
Rosario told the board.
RP's true grade
Ambassador Del Rosario explained that he wanted CalPERS to
consider the World Bank's positive assessment of the Philippines,
which would add at least .125 to its previous score of 1.87.
Evidence of Philippine compliance with IOSCO principles would
add another .125 pushing the Philippines score above the 2.0
threshold, he said.
In my brief speech, I reminded the board members that their
decision would have a far-reaching impact on the Philippines,
as a decision to disinvest would trigger a run on foreign
investments in the former US colony. This would cause the
Philippine economy to suffer and many countless Filipinos
to lose their jobs.
After we concluded our presentation, controller Steve Westly
made a motion to postpone action on the Philippines until
the next board meeting on April 19, which would allow Wilshire
time to fully review and evaluate the additional information
provided by the Philippines. Westly's motion was adopted unanimously.
Plan of attack
In the following 34 days, a sophisticated unified approach
to dealing with the issue was formulated. Ambassador Del Rosario
and his staff would meet with Wilshire and tackle the technical
end. Fil-Am community leaders would deal with the political
aspect of the campaign.
Alice Bulos, the San Mateo county founder and chairperson
of the California FilAm Democratic Caucus, called up Fil-Am
Democrats throughout the state, including San Francisco's
Jose Caedo and Solano County's Larry Asera, asking them to
lobby the Democrats on the board. Alice also called in all
her personal chits with organized labor, whose two representatives
on the board were opposed to outsourcing jobs to foreign countries
like the Philippines.
According to Westly, the lobbying effort paid off with three
of the nine opposed to the Philippines changing their votes,
making it seven to six for the Philippines. With knowledge
of that pivotal change, Wilshire decided to accept the Philippine
figures and to up its grade to 2.12. This grade change provided
Philippine champions Westly and Brown with the ammunition
to lobby the other board members to make the vote for the
Philippines unanimous.
"We got he last two votes just on the Saturday before
the Board meeting," Westly disclosed.
All that was left was the formality.
On April 19, Wilshire Associates announced that the 2003 grade
for the Philippines had been revised to 2.12, a spectacular
.64 increase from its 2002 score of 1.48. The board unanimously
approved the Wilshire recommendation.
The difference
When interviewed on The Filipino Channel, Westly was asked
what difference the Filipino-American community played in
securing the unanimous vote of the CalPERS Board, he replied:
"All the difference in the world."
Ambassador Del Rosario thanked the 500 Fil-Ams who attended
the CalPERS board meeting for "showing the deep concern
and solidarity of the Fil-Am community with the people of
the Motherland."
A victory at last! Remember the CalPERS!
Send comments to rodel50@aol.com.
|