|
Pacquiao's wish

|
Advertisement
|
THE FERVENT wish of Manny Pacquiao, expressed simply just
after his stunning victory over Mexican champion Erik Morales
in Las Vegas on January 21, was: "Sana magkaintindihan
na po tayong lahat."
While his words literally mean "I hope we all will understand
each other," colloquially, as Manila newspapers noted,
it means "I hope we'll all finally end our differences."
Pacquiao's wish may finally happen at least on the issue
of the Filipino Veterans Equity Bill now pending in the US
Congress.
It may surprise many to learn that there were differences
in the battle for the equity bill but there were and they
centered on the amount of "full benefits" that the
veterans should receive.
For some, "full benefits" for veterans meant that
the Filipino veterans should receive $800 a month, the average
amount that US veterans in the US receive as their military
pension. This was the amount stated in HR 302, the "Filipino
Veterans Equity Act of 2005," sponsored in 2005 by Rep.
Randy Cunningham, together with Representative Bob Filner,
which sought "to deem certain service in the organized
military forces of the Government of the Commonwealth of the
Philippines and the Philippine Scouts to have been active
service for purposes of benefits under programs administered
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs."
According to the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate
based on a figure of 18,000 veterans in the Philippines and
6,000 US-based vets, the Cunningham-Filner bill would cost
about $159M a year.
For others, however, "full benefits" should be
viewed in the context of the conditions where they are received.
Representative Juanita Millender-MacDonald (D- Los Angeles),
together with Representative Darrell Issa (R-Los Angeles),
sponsored HR 170 ("The Filipino Fairness Act") which
sought to improve benefits for Filipino veterans of World
War II by providing $800 a month for the 5,000 Filipino WW
II veterans in the US and $100 a month for the 18,000 Filipino
veterans in the Philippines. Total price: $22M a year.
Supporters of the MacDonald-Issa Bill argued that it would
be highly unrealistic to expect the Republican Congress to
pass a bill that will cost US taxpayers $159M a year when
the US has a major budget deficit caused by the Bush tax cuts
and the Iraq War. It would be better to fight for 5,000 pesos
a month which could be obtained rather than for 40,000 pesos
a month that could never be gotten (a bird in the hand is
better than two in the bush). Besides, they argued, living
on $800 a month in the US was about equivalent in hardship
to living on 5,000 pesos a month in the Philippines.
Those supporting the Cunningham-Filner Bill, on the other
hand, argue that "Equity means equity. You cannot oppose
inequity by supporting another inequity. Why should there
be a difference between what Filipino veterans in the US receive
and what Filipino veterans in the Philippines receive? That's
discrimination!"
It was a fight of Pacquiao-Morales proportions. "In
this corner, weighing $159M a year, is the 'all or nothing'
boxer. In the other corner, weighing $22M a year, is the 'fight
for what we can get' slugger."
Unfortunately, this issue was only of interest to Filipinos
as it hardly entered the radar screen of the Republican majority.
Of the 198 sponsors of HR 677 (HR 302's predecessor) in 2004,
179 were Democrats and only 19 were Republicans. Adding a
major obstacle to HR 302's success was House Speaker Dennis
Hastert announcement last year that only bills supported by
a majority of Republicans would be allowed to go to a floor
vote.
Add another problem: the 19 Republicans supporting the veterans
equity bill was reduced by one last month, the most important
one at that. Its main Republican sponsor, Rep. Randy "Duke"
Cunningham (R-California), was forced to resign in December
after he was indicted for receiving $2M from a special interest
lobbyist.
Fortunately, two weeks after Cunningham's resignation, Rep.
Darrell Issa (R-California) stepped into the breach and came
forward to sponsor the new Filipino Veterans Equity Bill now
known as HR 4574.
While Issa is still a co-sponsor of the MacDonald-Issa Bill,
he sees room for compromise as all the veterans' support groups
backed the budget proposal of Rep. Lane Evans (D-Illinois)
which he introduced last year for $22M to be included in the
federal budget for Filipino veterans equity.
The compromise of $22M a year, it is now proposed, would
be based on the allocation of $200 a month for ALL Filipino
WW II veterans, regardless of whether they are in the US or
in the Philippines. There would thus be no discrimination
between the two groups.
In addition to the $200 a month in pension benefits, the
5,000 Filipino WW II veterans in the US would still be eligible
to apply for and to receive $600 a month in SSI benefits,
which is not a military benefit and is based solely on income
and residence in the US. In California, Filipino veterans
would be entitled to an additional $200 a month in state assistance.
The "magkaintindihan" that Pacquiao wished for
may finally be at hand for the Filipino veterans whose average
age is about 85 years old (if they were 20 when the war began
in 1941). Because of their advanced age, their death rate
is exponentially high and any further delay would be unmercifully
cruel.
The 60th anniversary of the nefarious Rescission Act which
created the inequity problem by specifically declaring that
military service in the Philippines under the US during WW
II was not military service in the armed forces of the United
States for purposes of military benefits will be marked on
February 18, 2006.
Two days after this anniversary, on February 20, 2006, Philippine
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is scheduled to meet US
President George W. Bush in Washington DC. On behalf of the
Filipino veterans, she must press Bush to back the Filipino
veterans equity bill and President Bush must get his Republican
majority to back the bill. This is the year that the inequity
must end.
Pass the Filipino Veterans Equity Act now!
Send comments to Rodel50@aol.com.
|