|

Malaysia
and the Mindanao
peace process
By Carlos Isagani T. Zarate
"LOOK at the region-if the Philippines or the parties
were looking for a mediator, who could it be? Indochina was
out because of the Philcag role there. Indonesia was in no
position with its internal problems. Singapore has no credibility
with Islamic groups. Brunei is a non-player. Thailand has
its own Muslim separatist problem. It's almost a role cut
out for Malaysia," Malaysian academic, Khoo Boo Teik,
said in June 2001 during an interview by peace advocate and
legal scholar Soliman Santos.
Khoo Boo Teik's comments were included in Santos' revised
treatise on the role of Malaysia as mediator in the on and
off peace negotiations between the government and the Moro
Islamic Liberation Front. Though expressed almost two years
ago, the Malaysian academic's statements still aptly portrayed
the closely linked yet dichotomized interests of the Philippines
and Malaysia, which, since 2001, already played host to the
GRP-MILF peace panels. With Malaysia's active role, issues
like the Sabah claim-a long-time thorn in Philippine-Malaysia
relations-is temporarily taking a backseat.
Interestingly, both countries are presently in the thick
of elections.
Malaysia's ruling party Umno now under the leadership of
Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Dr. Mohamad Mahathir's
successor, is facing strong challenges from the main Islamic
opposition party, Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS), and others
like the one headed by the wife of jailed former Deputy Minister
Anwar Ibrahim.
Back at home, the Macapagal administration is similarly facing
neck-and-neck challenges in an election where issues like
competence in governance, peace and order, corruption, cronyism,
poverty, economy and sovereignty, among others, are giving
way to a pure popularity contest and hype.
Although, Malaysia may be less likely to suffer the so-called
"Spanish Syndrome" because of its strong stand against
the US-led "coalition of the willing," it cannot
be discounted that the Philippines is in the target-range
for terroristic attacks, especially during the election period.
Despite the optimistic assurances, the present administration
cannot be too assured that it will not suffer the fate of
outgoing Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, who, like
President Macapagal-Arroyo, was an early zealous backer of
the US-led Iraq invasion.
Yet, whatever may be the results of the two elections, their
outcome will have some effect in the course of the talks for
peace in Mindanao and in the bilateral relations of the two
countries. In his treatise, Santos cited several sources who
concluded that a "peaceful solution" to the MILF
rebellion is not only in the best interest of the Philippines
but more so for Malaysia. In several pronouncements with reference
to the GRP-MILF peace talks, Malaysian officials are one in
saying that the problem in Mindanao "has become part
of our national interest."
Economic and security concerns like the influx of Filipino
refugees (both economic ones and those displaced by war) in
Sabah, the terror activities of the Abu Sayyaf and the fight
against globalization are among the common reasons cited why
Malaysia is keen on achieving a comprehensive resolution to
the peace talks.
Beyond these concerns, Santos curiously observed that the
Philippine claim on Sabah has been muted. But before he died,
MILF chairperson Hashim Salamat, "among the key players
in the tripartite equation," had candidly said that "Malaysia
is hoping that if she could play (an) important role in ending
the conflict between the warring nations, the Sabah claim
may be dropped or delayed indefinitely."
"Sabah is an important factor in the Mindanao conflict
and peace process if only because of geographical (aside from
historical) proximity," Santos said. "Mindanao is
so near Sabah, any war in Mindanao will result in the influx
of refugees and the social problems they bring to Sabah. But
aside from such external inroads, there are also internal
dynamics involved. One Malaysian academic points to the need
to understand the politics of Sabah, as the only state with
a rotation of ruling parties. Since most of the refugees are
Muslims, their influx may be disadvantageous to the non-Muslim
political parties. As it is, already about one-third of the
population in Sabah are Filipino descendants.
"And so there is a demographic (aside from geographic)
dimension involved," Santos noted.
These internal dynamics are also at play in the rest of Malaysia.
Being predominantly Muslim, there is a natural concern in
Malaysia for the Moro Muslims in the Philippines.
The ruling party Umno, Santos said, must show that it is
helping the Muslim Filipinos, especially since it has "lost
significant votes" to PAS in recent elections.
As to the timing of the Malaysian "mediation,"
Santos noted that the Sipadan hostage crisis and the Philippine
government's "all-out wars" became the "catalysts
or wake-up calls." "With the former, there was some
fear about things getting out of hand. With the latter, it
was better for the Malaysian government to take the initiative
before the conflict goes beyond control."
* * *
IBP NOTES: The IBP-Davao City Chapter is sponsoring a two-day
Mandatory Continuing Legal Education seminar on March 29 and
30 at the Davao Trade and Convention Center. Interested parties
may get in touch with the IBP-Davao Office at tel. nos. (082)
296-00-70 and 299-07-53.
Comments at karlos_z23@hotmail.com
and kar_laws@yahoo.com
|