|
Life
By Carlos Isagani Zarate
Inquirer

|
Advertisement
|
"I'M RUNNING THROUGH A GAMUT OF EMOTIONS." This
was how Ateneo de Davao University Prof. Luz Ilagan described
her feelings at a press conference last week, as she denounced
the "malicious and ridiculous" inclusion of her
name in a rebellion complaint filed by police authorities
at the Department of Justice.
No stranger to draconian rule-a family member was imprisoned
during the Marcos regime-Ilagan has all the reasons to be
apprehensive, angry - and yes - even defiant. "It's dèjá
vu. We are going through repression all over again. But we
have to fight for our rights."
Luz is the widow of the late Davao legal luminary Laurente
Ilagan, who was jailed in 1985, together with two other Davao
lawyers-Marcos Risonar and Antonio Arellano - by force of
the dreaded Preventive Detention Action (PDA) which allowed
warrantless arrests.
The case of the three Davao lawyers is now enshrined in Philippine
jurisprudence as the "Ilagan Doctrine" (Ilagan vs.
Enrile, 139 SCRA 349).
The soft-spoken current national chair of the Gabriela Women's
Party-List (her partymate, Rep. Liza Maza, is among the "housemates"
currently under protective custody of the House of Representatives),
Ilagan was a former Davao City councilor. She was among the
first appointees of the Aquino administration following the
1986 People Power Revolution.
While she was in Davao City for the International Women's
Day last March 8, the police Directorate for Investigation
and Detective Management in Manila included her in a charge
sheet for rebellion. Also in the charge sheet were Davao-based
militant leaders Bayan Muna Rep. Joel Virador, Ariel Casilao
of Bayan, Editha Duterte of the urban poor group Kadamay,
Omar Bantayan of Kilusang Mayo Uno, Jeppie Ramada of Bayan
Muna, Antonio Flores of Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas,
Cora Espinosa of Samakana and Lorie Ann Cascaro of Anakbayan
youth sector.
The charge sheet is based on the joint affidavit of PNP intelligence
operatives Franco S. Duca and Rex Rodriguez and on photos
showing the march-rally led by Ilagan and her group during
the Feb. 24 commemoration of Edsa I.
"It is not only baseless but, more importantly, it is
ridiculous," said lawyer Angela Librado-Trinidad, chair
of the city council's committee on women and children.
Here are the "ridiculous" allegations, that the
police authorities claim constitute rebellion: "(M)ass
action rally particularly at the freedom park ... said personalities
were involved in the aggressive actions to destabilized (sic)
the Philippine government .... (they) started to march from
freedom park passing along the main streets and ... at centennial
park ... they shouted their politically inclined beliefs to
establish a transitional council to replaced (sic) the Arroyo
Regime and to OUST PGMA and all other related issues to opposed
(sic) the government interest... strongly call for the immediate
resignation of PGMA."
"The charge sheet is not only baseless but it is also
unbelievable. It cannot even approach the definition of rebellion
as defined in the Revised Penal Code," commented Caesar
Europa, president of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines-Davao
City Chapter. "At least the Marcos dictatorship (was)
predictable" and had no pretenses about employing dictatorial
measures, he added.
"This administration is more dangerous because it is
doble cara (two-faced), pretending to be democratic but employing
draconian measures to silence its critics," Ilagan said.
Of the "Davao 8," only Antonio Flores of KMP had
faced similar charges in the past. Flores, a militant peasant
leader, was charged in 2001 and imprisoned for more than a
year for the crime of rebellion and illegal possession of
firearms. He was later acquitted on both charges.
"If fighting for the rights of the peasants and calling
for the ouster of a fake president are an act of rebellion,
then so be it. I will not be cowed by this latest trumped-up
charge against us," Flores said.
Given the state of paranoia currently bedeviling the Arroyo
administration, it would not be surprising if in the coming
days more ridiculous charges are leveled against those perceived
as "destabilizers and enemies of the state."
The administration could become more brazen in filing these
charges as it continues to conduct a massive witch-hunt of
its perceived enemies-in the political opposition, and even
in the press. In Cagayan de Oro, for example, our chair in
the Union of Peoples' Lawyers in Mindanao (UPLM), Fred Gapuz,
reportedly has been included in the military's "order
of battle" for his being a critic of the Arroyo administration.
Last Friday's arrest of former Social Welfare Secretary Dinky
Soliman is another indication of this trend. So under the
beleaguered Arroyo administration, walking along a major Metro
Manila thoroughfare, while wearing a black T-shirt with a
provocative slogan, is already a crime!
Indeed, even with its so-called lifting, Proclamation 1017
remains the real "residual threat" to our constitutionally
guaranteed rights.
The continued crackdown on the political opposition and the
critical press is a clear indicator that the Arroyo administration
will employ all measures, legal or otherwise, to ensure its
survival.
"These trumped-up charges against me and my colleagues
are part of life," Ilagan said as she vowed that oppression
and injustice "will not deter us, life goes on."
Incidentally, when her husband was arrested in 1985, "life"
was taken to mean "Larry Ilagan Forever." This time
around, "life" may as well mean "Luz Ilagan
Forever" and "Laban is Forever."
Comments at kar_laws@yahoo.com
or karlos_z23@hotmail.com
Copyright 2006 Inquirer. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|