|
 Shut
up and move on

THE SUPREME COURT'S ruling on Monday that the impeachment
charge filed against Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. was
unconstitutional helped defused an explosive situation that
was about to tear the nation asunder.
What should have been a routine investigation of Judiciary
Development Fund disbursements by the Supreme Court by the
House committee on justice turned into a veritable witch hunt
against Davide by an opposition bent on seeking revenge for
Davide's role in swearing-in Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as president
after the EDSA II protests in January 2001 and the near impeachment
of then president Joseph Estrada on corruption charges.
I initially supported the opposition's charges against Davide,
horrified by the seemingly wanton spending of public money
on lavish furnishings, cars and Baguio bungalows. Initial
figures that came out claimed that five million pesos had
been spent on new curtains for the Supreme Court (and for
the record, it was for 5.5 kilometers of curtains, not 55
kilometers as I wrongly reported), 31 million pesos on "luxury
cars" (1.5 million pesos each for 19 cars and a few vans
most of which were mid-level Toyota Camrys, hardly luxury
sedans), 8 million pesos on furniture (each Supreme Court
justice got a new chair worth 25,000 pesos each and not 120,000
pesos as initially reported), and finally 34 million pesos
for the building of new Baguio bungalows, after previous ones
had been destroyed in an earthquake.
Davide's initial silence on these accusations and his repeated
insistence that he didn't have to testify before the House
justice committee, after being asked to do so for a year,
pushed many congressmen to sign the impeachment demand against
Davide. Although most of the 80 signatories were from the
opposition Nationalist People's Coalition, a few were from
the ruling Lakas-NUCD and the LDP.
Finally, last week the Supreme Court posted a detailed document
on its website called "The Truth About the JDF,"
which detailed how the JDF had been spent over the last three
years. It also explained how much money was spent on cars,
curtains, furniture and the Baguio buildings. It provided
believable explanations for all these expenses. If only Davide
had released this document much earlier, many of the accusations
against the Supreme Court could have been avoided.
I think President Macapagal should have intervened in the
House-Supreme Court spat months ago, but the resentments were
allowed to fester, which each side believing that it had the
right to either investigate the other body or ignore it. Pride
on both sides made all involved dig in deeper, turning what
should have been a routine accounting probe into a political
battle royale.
In the end, I still believe that an impeachment is a political
act, not a judicial one, and that only the House of Representatives
can initiate one. Once the impeachment rap is sent to the
Senate, then the Senate sits as the impeachment court. That
impeachment court is higher than any other court of the land,
including the Supreme Court. Read the Philippine Constitution.
As one of my readers in the US, Jove Trinidad, pointed out:
"The Constitution is clear that even a Chief Justice
can be impeached; that at least 1/3 of the members of the
House of Representatives may 'initiate' or 'file' the proceedings
against him and that the Senate has the sole power to try
and decide his impeachment. (See Article XI)"
But that is all moot now. On Monday, the House voted on the
measure and only 77 of the 188 members present voted not to
accept the Supreme Court ruling and go ahead and transmit
the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. That meets the
1/3 threshold needed to transmit the impeachment, but opposition
congressmen should admit that they misread public opinion
on this issue big-time and just move on. As Conrado de Quiros
pointed out in his Philippine Daily Inquirer column this week,
the real corruption is not to be found in the Supreme Court,
but in the salas of those corrupt regional trial court judges
who put their decisions up for bidding to the highest bidder.
Sad but true.
***
I RECEIVED a veritable torrent of mostly angry, some abusive,
e-mail after my last column in which I defended the opposition's
probe of Davide's handling of the JDF funds.
To put the record straight for everyone concerned, I'm not
Filipino and I don't have any connection to any political
party anywhere. And no, I didn't receive any pay-off from
Danding Cojuangco!
I did read both the 2000 and 2001 Commission on Audit's reports
of the Supreme Court, which I downloaded from the CoA's website.
None broke down the spending on individual items like curtains,
cars, furniture and Baguio homes.
And finally, just a short note to say that my column Manila
Moods celebrates its 10th anniversary this year.
Comments or questions? E-mail the author at manilamoods@hotmail.com.
Visit the author's website at http://www.manilamoods.com.
|