|

Christmas 1945
LAST Friday, my column was about how we might use our holiday
gifts to promote "native chic" -- the idea that
local products aren't just good but very good and, if we want
to play on class consciousness, are actually most chic.
Some friends have been calling in to say they appreciated
the reminder, one of them being "Tita" Gilda Cordero-Fernando,
who asked for more "native chic" columns. Since
I can (almost) never say no to her, I thought of expanding
that first article while we're still in the holiday season.
For today's column, I'm going to pick up on this idea of
native chic, emphasizing the need to buy local as a way of
building not just economic but also social capital.
168 Mall
My column last week suggested, strongly, that we might want
to avoid the 168 Mall for Christmas shopping, even if, admittedly,
its stuff is really, really cheap. Shortly after I did the
column, I read that the Bureau of Internal Revenue raided
168 and found that nine out of every 10 stalls there were
evading taxes. That should be enough reason to avoid 168,
right?
Not quite. Frankly, considering the way our taxes are used (or
misused), 168's tax evasion isn't my main reason for boycotting
it. My problem with 168 is that precious foreign exchange goes
into the importation of those goods, and I'm being kind here,
using the word "importation" (there's a lot of smuggling
and corruption at Customs involved).
The capitalists are mainland Chinese (and, lately Koreans,
I hear) so the money made doesn't stay either, except for
the paltry wages paid to the sales clerks. Well, there are
rumors that the money does stay in the country to fund less
than wholesome manufacturing activities by the mainland Chinese.
I have no way of verifying this, so I won't go into detail.
All said, 168 doesn't help the country and may even be doing
great harm. An irony really because "168" is derived
from the Chinese's love of magical numbers: 168 means "the
road to prosperity." The question is, whose prosperity?
For capitalism to work, capital must generate more capital.
That isn't happening with 168's operations. At least the Chinese
goods sold in legitimate mall establishments help to lubricate
the economy through taxes (sort of) and new venture capital.
Social capital
But, there's more to all this than loss of economic capital.
For the country to move forward, we also need social capital,
which consists of knowledge, skills and values that are passed
from one generation to another. Like economic capital, social
capital needs to accumulate and to "reproduce."
We lose both economic and social capital with our addiction
to imported stuff. Certainly, the lure of the "imported"
is universal, and certainly we've been addicted to imported
stuff for several centuries -- even before the Spaniards arrived,
there was a thriving trade with the Chinese.
But my gripe is that today, with import liberalization, our
addiction has grown to an unprecedented scale, to the extent
that we are killing initiatives for local production. Why
bother to put up new manufacturing firms when you can just
import from China? What happens here is an erosion of traditional
knowledge and skills, the social capital future generations
could have used.
Inquirer had an article about how lantern makers were losing
out to the cheap imported Chinese lights. Even sadder was
how they've stopped producing some product lines, such as
abaca lanterns. We're bound to see more of these products
disappearing, together with vital knowledge and skills. Even
more disturbing, I hear that cheap versions of our lanterns
are now beginning to show up overseas-produced in mainland
China. I shudder to think that in a few years, my Yna will
be buying "Filipino" lanterns that are made in China,
perhaps with a whole bunch of kitschy electronic
innovations. I'd be heartbroken, too, if all that I'll have
to show her are photographs of the original traditional lanterns.
Carols and cards
When we buy local products, we're not just supporting local
businesses, we're actually creating a demand for more of those
local products, which means knowledge and skills are passed
on, often with innovations.
Nothing is too inconsequential as we build this social capital.
I'm still perplexed at the lack of locally designed Christmas
cards and wonder why it took the Unicef to popularize Manuel
Baldemor designs for such cards. OK, so maybe paper Christmas
cards are on their way out because of e-cards on the Internet,
but that should only push us to move in and produce Filipino
designs for these e-cards.
The other night, I brought my Yna to her first concert: the
University of the Philippines' Singing Ambassadors' "Pamaskong
Handog" by the Baywalk in Manila. I had a moment of nostalgia
remembering how our school choir went around caroling. That's
disappearing, too, with caroling now used by urban poor kids
to extort money as they ambush your car: "Pay, or we
torture you with our singing." I sometimes tell the kids,
at least sing local carols, but I wonder just how many of
these songs are still being passed on.
The UP Singing Ambassadors does have a new CD, "Songs
of the Season," with their rendition of 15 traditional
English and Filipino carols, explaining why they keep reaping
so many awards.
Building social capital doesn't mean sticking to the traditional.
I read about a CD of Kapampangan carols, "Kalam ning
Pasko," composed by Crispin Cadiang and sung by the likes
of Mon David and Antoinette Taus. Simply having carols in
Kapampangan is an example of building social capital.
But I haven't been able to find that CD in Manila. We need
better marketing for so many of these products, and together
with that marketing we need more conscious efforts to build
on the "social capital" aspect. For example, the
recordings could come with a brief historical vignette for
each of the songs. It was only yesterday, through Manolo Quezon's
column http://news.inq7.net/opinion/index.php?index=2&story_id=60719&col=111,
that I learned about "Payapang Daigdig" being composed
by Felipe de Leon in 1945, a few months after the bombing
of Manila that killed thousands of Filipinos. Christmas that
year must have been harrowing for the maimed, hungry and homeless
survivors.
Manolo's history of the song could not have been timelier,
because the night before I was listening to it on the Singing
Ambassadors' latest CD. It's always been one of my favorites
and I suspect it will be for Yna, too. For now, I'm fully
content humming the tune to Yna as a lullaby, dreaming of
De Leon's peaceful nights, quiet stars and the gentle breeze.
But someday, when Yna's older, around "Noche Buena"
[Christmas Eve feast] and beneath a colorful "parol"
[Christmas lantern], hopefully not made in China, I'll explain
the lyrics to her, and why, remembering Christmas 1945, we
must never give up on building peace, at home and in the world.
Copyright 2005 Inquirer. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|