|

Low
demand for hi-tech jobs

THE "NO Jobs Available" signs are all over, virtual
or otherwise. Computer science graduates need not apply according
to the mother and father of high-tech graduates.
INA shows the decreased numbers for H-1B working visas, which
computer professionals generally belong to and are petitioned
in this working visa category. INA (also the Filipino word
for mother) stands for the Immigration and Nationality Act,
the bible of US immigration laws.
AMA shows signs of diversifying ö away from hi-tech
course focus. AMA now offers nursing and healthcare courses,
caregivers included. A college of medicine is not far behind.
AMA is the biggest computer learning institution in the Philippines.
Hi-tech professionals, computer science graduates are now
staring at their monitors, surfing the web and searching the
Internet for options. The search results show the same dire
prospects: hi-tech jobs are no longer in demand ö at
least not in the scale the hi-tech industry experienced from
1995 until the dot.com bomb.
Since Philippine computer or high-tech graduates look mainly
to the US for employment opportunities, let us look at the
US job outlook. This from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics:
In 2002, manufacturing jobs (to which computer and electronic
products belong) accounted for 35 percent of all layoffs.
When workers are laid off, they file unemployment claims.
The highest number of claims was posted in California -- where
Silicon Valley, the information technology mecca, is located
-- with 745,638, higher than in any other region in the country.
Among the 50 states and the District of Columbia, California
recorded the largest number of initial claims filed in mass
layoffs: 576,110.
236,000 high-tech jobs lost in 2002
THE ASSOCIATED Press reported March 18, 2003, that US high-tech
industry shed another 236,000 jobs last year, continuing a
two-year purge that shows few signs of easing.
The report continued that America's high-tech employment,
totaled 5.15 million jobs at the end of 2002, a four-percent
drop from 5.38 million jobs at the year's outset, according
to an analysis by American Electronics Association, an industry
trade group, now known as AeA.
Since January 2001, high-tech employers have dumped 560,000
workers to pare their payrolls by 10 percent, according to
the report.
Last year, high-tech jobs continued to drop every month of
2002, with slightly more than half of the cuts -- 123,000
jobs -- occurring in the final half of the year.
AeA says before the dot-bomb, high-tech companies boasted
about two million manufacturing jobs, more than any other
industry. By the end of 2002, high-tech's manufacturing jobs
had shriveled by 20 percent to 1.6 million jobs.
The only bright spot in this otherwise gloomy outlook is
that software services remains robust, adding 5,300 jobs during
the two years ended in 2002. The other side of this good news
is that software programming is now being outsourced. Instead
of sponsoring H-1B workers ö the working visa for computer
professionals -- US-based companies send the work to India,
the Philippines, China, Mexico, Costa Rica, South Africa,
Russia and Europe, where the cost of labor is 10 times cheaper
than in the US. Business Week reported in February 2003 that
in 2005 the total jobs moving out of the US would be 588,000,
of which 109,000 would be in the computer field. In 2015,
the number would zoom to 3,300,000.
Reverse work migration
FORTUNE 500 companies such as Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Philips,
Accenture and General Electric have sent computer-related
work (chip design, software design, consumer electronics,
accounting and tech support) to Third World countries that
have a pool of skilled workers.
Instead of hiring the workers and paying them high wages,
US companies send the work overseas for the same quality work
but low overhead and cost/benefit package. Computer professionals
do not get to the US but still get wages higher than those
paid to local or domestic workers. For info-tech support,
for example, a database manager in India gets 500 dollars
a month, compared with what the US company would have to pay
a US counterpart: 10,000 dollars.
Accountants in the Philippines get paid 300 dollars a month,
compared with 5,000 dollars a month that big corporations
would have to pay an H-1B sponsored accountant. As the saying
goes, why pay for the cow when all you need is a hamburger?
H-1B visas reduced
THE H visa classification was originally enacted in 1952
and includes the H-2 for temporary workers in short supply
and H-3 for trainees. In 1986 the H-2 category was further
subdivided into H-2A (for temporary workers in agriculture)
and H-2B for temporary workers in non-agricultural jobs.
In 1989 the H-1A category was created for nurses through
the Immigration Nursing Relief Act. The H-1B was for other
professions and occupations other than nurses.
The 1990 Act set numerical limits to the number of H-1B visas
that may be issued yearly. H-1Bs were limited to only 65,000
annually. In 1998 the quota was increased to 115,000 up to
the year 2000, receding to 107,500 in the year 2001 and returning
to the 65,000 level thereafter. The quota was increased to
195,000 in the year 2000 in response to aggressive lobbying
campaign and concerns over America's competitive position
in the global marketplace. The cap will drop down to the previous
65,000 in October 2003 unless increased by the US Congress
this year.
With the unemployment outlook, the prospects of increasing
the H-1B visa numbers are dim.
On April 4, 2003, the Bureau of Citizenship Services (BCIS)
-- the bureau that took over the services function of the
defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service in March 2003
-- announced the usage of the H-1B allocation.
Petitions filed
Petitions approved
2000
299,046
257,640
2001
342,035
331,206
2002
215,190
197,537
The numbers reflect the high-tech job meltdown in 2000. And
as industry observers note, the downward trend has been continuing.
Advocates' proposals
IMMIGRATION and business advocates argue that a point system
similar to that enforced in Canada and Commonwealth Nations
(such as New Zealand and Australia) could be adopted by the
United States. Under this proposal, the BCIS can pre-approve
certain industries or occupations for H-1B benefits on a quarterly
or half-yearly basis. This is a radical departure from the
current skills classification and would amplify the prevailing
Schedule A and Schedule B occupations, the counterpart of
the Nationals Occupations List in the Commonwealth nations.
In Schedule A are occupations considered to be in short supply
and therefore have been issued a blanket labor certification.
Currently, only nurses and physical therapists are in this
category as well as manager and/or executive of multinational
companies (in the L-1 visa category). Schedule B occupations
are those the US Department of Labor believes need labor market
testing, hence individual labor certifications are needed.
In some cases, one H-2B petition could be filed for multiple
beneficiaries, such as if a hotel chain need a number of hotel
workers. However, the labor certification is still required,
meaning the employer still has to advertise the position in
a newspaper of general circulation for three consecutive times,
conduct the recruitment process and submit the certification
for approval. Only then could the H-2B petition be filed.
So, the next time you see or hear an ad extolling the virtues
of enrolling in computer science because you could have an
overseas job, think twice. The ad may not be misleading because
the overseas job is coming to the Philippines. But you are
definitely not going to do the work in the US.
The pay might be high by domestic standards: 500 dollars
a month. But the US company is saving 9,500 dollars by having
the work done here. The news has spread far and wide. Maybe
that's why computer schools are also branching out to nursing
and care-giving courses?
Crispin R. Aranda is a US-based immigration specialist
and executive director of the Immigrant Visa Center +632 411-0806,
+632 414-2655 and +632 373.6799. You can also reach him at
usvisacenter@yahoo.com or in San Francisco, at +415 834-1052.
|