Quantcast

CA junks Arroyo ‘midnight appointments’

The Court of Appeals. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Court of Appeals has affirmed the constitutionality of President Benigno Aquino’s revocation of the so-called “midnight appointments” of his predecessor, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

In a 23-page decision dated August 28, the Court of Appeals Former 8th Division dismissed the petitions for interventions filed by Irma Villanueva and Francisco Rosquita who asked for the nullification of Aquino’s Executive Order No. 2 that revoked appointments made by Arroyo during the 2010 election period.

“[T]he controversial EO 2 was a valid exercise of the executive powers of the President in ensuring that the rule on midnight appointments is properly implemented,” the appeals tribunal ruled in the decision written by Justice Noel Tijam.

The other division members, Justice Romeo Barza and Edwin Sorongon, concurred.

On March 3, 2010, Arroyo appointed Villanueva as administrator for the Visayas of the Board of Administrators of the Cooperative Development Authority under the Department of Finance. She took her oath of office on April 13, 2010.

Rosquita on the other hand, was appointed member of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples on March 5, 2010. She took her oath on March 18, 2010.

Aquino issued EO 2 shortly after he assumed the presidency on June 30, 2010. Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa later issued a memorandum revoking the appointments of Rosquita, Villanueva and others.

The NCIP executive director wrote a letter to the Civil Service Commission’s personnel policies and standards office on July 12, 2010, inquiring whether the employees of the government appointed before March 10, 2010 were considered midnight appointees.

The Commission replied in a letter dated August 31, 2010, stating that under CSC’s appointment rules, government employees appointed before March 10, 2010 were not considered midnight appointees, even if they took they oaths of office or assumed office after March 10, 2010.

Villanueva and Rosquita used the CSC declaration in contending that EO 2 revised the CSC’s appointment rules, and trampled on the CSC’s prerogative as an independent constitutional body.

However, the Court of Appeals stated that the rules formulated by the CSC “must not override, but must be in harmony with, the law it seeks to apply and implement.”

“We are of the considered view that petitioners-intervenors are midnight appointees within the contemplation of Section 15, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution,” the appeals justices said.

Section 15 prohibits an outgoing president from making appointments two months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end of his term.

The Aquino administration took the position that the appointments were invalid unless the appointee also took her or his oath of office or assumed office before the cutoff.

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

Copyright © 2015,

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate: c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94



News

  • 24 fall ill after eating rice, noodles in South Cotabato
  • Czech president tells migrants: ‘No one invited you’
  • DOLE urged to inspect all Ricky Reyes’ salons for labor law compliance
  • Comelec taps US firm to review source code in 2016 automated polls
  • Batac resigns from DND post; Azcueta takes over tasks
  • Sports

  • Manila North gains Fiba 3×3 world final
  • Gilas Pilipinas pool known Monday
  • Shakey’s V-League: FEU nails 4th victory; UST scores
  • Gilligan’s, Foton Tornadoes forge Superliga Beach Volley title duel
  • NU blasts Letran in Jumbo Cup; Ateneo, CKSC up
  • Lifestyle

  • ‘Heritage-sensitivity’ course urged for Malacañang, DPWH
  • Soprano lends her voice to PC games
  • UST Singers sweeps choral contest in Florence, Italy
  • Kids take charge, effect change in KidZania theme park
  • Who’s Joe America? Why did he make it to Aquino’s Sona?
  • Entertainment

  • Ruffa, Annabelle always argue about men
  • Brillante Ma. Mendoza retro in Sarajevo
  • Humble bragging
  • Love Knots, August 3, 2015
  • A. Lipin, August 3, 2015
  • Business

  • Rapid cloud adoption marks end of the beginning
  • Silicon Valley-type zone mulled for local tech startups
  • Starmalls sets stock offer
  • UAE, PH to proceed with air talks this month
  • Go big or go home
  • Technology

  • BIR axes tax filing by e-mail
  • Who’s Joe America? Why did he make it to Aquino’s Sona?
  • Journo accidentally sends picture of genitals to group chat of 150
  • PH ‘most social nation’–report
  • Windows 10 entices millions in first day
  • Opinion

  • Editorial Cartoon, August 2, 2015
  • Shaking things up
  • Empty?
  • Maguindanao massacre: Acid test for justice system
  • The weight of a presidential endorsement
  • Global Nation

  • Duterte to military attaches: PH not out for war; China should just let us fish in seas
  • PH vows action on Yolanda rebuilding after UN criticism
  • Asean, China discuss emergency ‘hotline’ for sea dispute—PH
  • China cryptic on ‘second aircraft carrier base’ near West Ph Sea
  • AFP welcomes expanded joint military exercises
  • PHOTOS AND VIDEOS