West Philippine Sea: DFA disputes China’s claims on Ayungin resupply deal

By: - Reporter / @zacariansINQ
/ 11:32 AM July 22, 2024

West Philippine Sea: Shoal resupply missions to remain PH operation - NSC

This file photo taken on April 23, 2023 shows the grounded Philippine navy ship BRP Sierra Madre, where marines are stationed to assert Manila’s territorial claims at Second Thomas Shoal in the Spratly Islands, in disputed waters of the South China Sea. Manila’s resupply missions to troops on a disputed South China Sea atoll will remain purely Philippine operations, the National Security Council said July 21, 2024, after Washington vowed to “do what is necessary” to support them. FILE PHOTO/Agence France-Presse

MANILA, Philippines — The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on Monday disputed its Chinese counterpart’s claim that the Philippines agreed to prior notification and on-site confirmation for their agreed “temporary arrangement” for the rotation and resupply (Rore) missions of daily necessities to the BRP Sierra Madre in Ayungin (Second Thomas) Shoal.

In a statement, the DFA labeled Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian’s pronouncement as “inaccurate.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The principles and approaches laid out in the agreement were reached through a series of careful and meticulous consultations between both sides that paved the way for a convergence of ideas without compromising national positions,” the DFA said.

FEATURED STORIES

“The spokesperson’s statement regarding prior notification and on-site confirmation is therefore inaccurate,” it added.

READ: PH-China agreement reached on Ayungin

Article continues after this advertisement

Lin earlier stated that China had agreed to allow the Philippines to conduct its Rore missions, provided the Philippines informs them “in advance and after on-site verification is conducted.”

Article continues after this advertisement

He also added that China will monitor the entire resupply process, and even threatened to “resolutely stop” such missions if it included “large amount[s] of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost[s].”

Article continues after this advertisement

He then accused the Philippines of violating China’s sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, especially Article 5, which says the parties should refrain from action of inhabiting the uninhabited islands and reefs.

READ: West PH Sea: No Ayungin resupply since violent June 17 encounter

Article continues after this advertisement

“We continue to demand that the Philippines tow away the warship and restore Ren’ai Jiao’s state of hosting no personnel or facilities,” he said.

But the DFA insisted that the agreement “was concluded with the clear understanding by both sides that it will not prejudice our respective national positions.”

It maintained that the Philippines would continue to assert its rights and jurisdiction in its maritime zones, including Ayungin Shoal, which is well within the country’s exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, citing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Despite the disagreement, both sides reiterated that they agreed to jointly manage maritime differences in an effort to de-escalate tensions between the two countries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We emphasize that the agreement was done in good faith and the Philippines remains ready to implement it. We urge China to do the same,” the DFA said.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Ayungin Shoal, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.