West PH Sea: China Coast Guard ship rams BFAR vessel near Escoda Shoal

By: - Reporter / @FArgosinoINQ
, / 02:47 PM August 25, 2024

West PH Sea: China Coast Guard ship rams BFAR vessel near Escoda Shoal

ABOARD BRP DATU SANDAY, West Philippine Sea —China Coast Guard ship 21551 rammed the BRP Datu Sanday 10 nautical miles from Escoda Shoal in the West Philippine Sea at about 2:11 p.m. | PHOTO: Nestor Corrales

MANILA, Philippines — A China Coast Guard (CCG) ship rammed a vessel of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) near Escoda (Sabina) Shoal in the West Philippine Sea (WPS) on Sunday afternoon.

Based on a video taken by the Inquirer, CCG Ship 21551 hit BRP Datu Sanday while some of its personnel were seen filming the incident.

FEATURED STORIES

The collision occurred about 10 nautical miles from Escoda Shoal at 2:11 p.m.

Article continues after this advertisement

Another video posted by the Inquirer showed that the CCG ship 4102 fired a water cannon against BRP Datu Sanday while en route to the shoal.

Article continues after this advertisement

Additionally, six CCG vessels simultaneously fired water cannons against the BFAR vessel.

Article continues after this advertisement

INQUIRER.net has asked the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) for more details, but it has yet to reply as of posting time.

China’s state broadcaster CCTV reported, “The Philippine vessel 3002 illegally intruded into the waters near Xianbin Reef in the Nansha Islands without permission from the Chinese government.” CCTV referred to the Chinese names for Sabina Shoal and the Spratly Islands.

Article continues after this advertisement

The vessel then “continued to dangerously approach a Chinese coast guard vessel conducting normal operations”, CCTV said, adding that the coast guard had “taken control measures against the Philippine vessel in accordance with the law and regulations”.

The Philippines a day earlier accused China of recently firing flares at one of its aircraft as it patrolled over the West Philippine Sea Sea.

And on Monday, both countries said their coast guard ships had collided near the disputed Sabina Shoal, located 140 kilometers (86 miles) west of the Philippine island of Palawan and about 1,200 kilometers from Hainan island, the closest Chinese landmass.

Manila had said that it was the first hostile action by Beijing against it near Sabina, where both sides have stationed coast guard vessels in recent months and where the Philippines fears China is about to build an artificial island.

China and the Philippines have had repeated confrontations in the waters in recent months, including around a warship grounded years ago by Manila on the contested Second Thomas Shoal that hosts a garrison.

Last Aug. 13, the Philippine Navy monitored 92 Chinese vessels in various locations within the WPS from Aug. 6 to 12 this year.

Of this number, 10 were CCG vessels, nine were People’s Liberation Army Navy ships, 68 were Chinese maritime militia vessels, and two were research survey vessels.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Ten of the 92 vessels were spotted at Panatag Shoal, 13 at Ayungin Shoal, 38 at the Pagasa Islands, five at Lawak Island, five at Panata Island, 13 at Sabina Shoal, four at Julian Felipe Reef, and 30 at Iroquois Reef.

China claims almost the entire South China Sea and has ignored an international tribunal ruling that its assertions have no legal basis.

It deploys boats to patrol the busy waterway and has built artificial islands that it has militarized to reinforce its claims.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.