Vote counting machines for 2025 polls hurdle shading threshold test

/ 03:36 PM November 13, 2024

(From left) Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting National Coordinator Arwin Serrano and Commision on Elections Chairman George Erwin Garcia oversee the "stress testing" of automated counting machines for the 2025 midterm  elections at a warehouse in Biñan, Laguna on Wednesday, November 13, 2024. (INQUIRER.net/John Eric Mendoza) 

Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting National Coordinator Arwin Serrano (left) and Commission on Elections Chairman George Erwin Garcia (right) oversee the “stress testing” of automated counting machines for the 2025 midterm  elections at a warehouse in Biñan, Laguna on Wednesday, November 13, 2024. (INQUIRER.net/John Eric Mendoza)

LAGUNA, Philippines — Instead of usually shading the entire circle beside candidates’ names on official ballots, Commission on Elections (Comelec) Chairman George Erwin Garcia only put dots on it to cast his mock vote.

Garcia is testing the new and approved 15 percent shading threshold by the Comelec during the conduct of the acceptance test and “stress testing” of automated counting machines (ACM) at the election body’s Biñan warehouse on Wednesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

The threshold refers to the minimum shading on a ballot circle recognized as a valid vote.

FEATURED STORIES

Garcia then fed his ballot to the ACM.

The voting receipt from the ACM later showed that the tiny dots put by Garcia on the circle beside candidate’s names were recognized by the machine. 

Article continues after this advertisement

Thus, the ACM proved to be capable of scanning Comelec’s designated threshold.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The intention of the voter should be read by the machine,” Garcia said in a press conference after the demonstration.

Article continues after this advertisement

“During the test earlier, I just put a dot and did not spread the ink on the ballot circle. Whether it (the dot’s threshold) was at 15 percent or higher than 15 percent, it was counted,” he said.

Previously, the lowest shade threshold was at 25 percent. Less than that, the vote would be considered “ambiguous.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Now, Garcia said it’s only either “vote” or “no vote.”

Disputes on ballot shadings became the cause of electoral protests in the past.

“In manual counting, the dots are being counted, it is being claimed [as valid votes] by either the protestor or protestee,” Garcia noted.

The most notable case involved President Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos and former Vice President Leni Robredo, who claimed they won the 2016 vice presidential elections.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Marcos launched an electoral protest that led to a massive recount by the Supreme Court, which is sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal.

TAGS: Comelec, Philippine Elections

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.