Navy doubts China’s ‘routine patrol’ during PH drills with allies

/ 12:43 PM September 04, 2025

Chinese warships shadowed Philippine, Australian, and Canadian vessels during two days of joint naval drills near Scarborough Shoal this week, underscoring persistent tensions in the West Philippine Sea as the allies marked the 10th iteration of the Multilateral Maritime Cooperative Activity (MMCA).

Chinese warships were seen shadowing the participants of the MMCA that included the Philippine Navy’s BRP Jose Rizal (foreground) and Canada’s HMCS Ville de Québec

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippine Navy on Thursday disputed the claim of China’s “routine patrol” off Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal in response to the country’s drills with the United States, Canada, and Australia near the maritime feature’s vicinity.

Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad, navy spokesperson for the West Philippine Sea, said the two warships of the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) — a Luyang Class Guided Missile Destroyer and a Jiangkai Class Frigate — was monitored 40 nautical miles southeast of Panatag Shoal.

Article continues after this advertisement

“These ships were monitored during the conduct of the 10th MMCA (Multilateral Maritime Cooperative Activity) involving the US Navy, the Royal Canadian Navy, the Royal Australian Navy, and the Philippine Navy,” Trinidad said of the two PLA-N warships in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: China warships shadow PH, Australian, Canadian drills near Scarborough

The latest MMCA involved PH Navy’s flagship guided-missile frigate BRP Jose Rizal, Australia’s Hobart-class destroyer HMAS Brisbane, Canada’s Halifax-class frigate HMCS Ville de Québec, the United States reconnaissance aircraft, P-8A Poseidon, and other aerial assets.

Trinidad cast doubt on the purported patrol of PLA-N made in response to this patrolling fleet.

Article continues after this advertisement

“They were observed following the international task group and were not conducting any surface serials or synchronized movement that would generally indicate a joint patrol contrary to publications by the Southern Theater Command,” Trinidad also said of the two PLA-N warships.

READ: Repairs on CCG ship in Panatag collision may take 2 months — PH Navy

Article continues after this advertisement

On Wednesday, PLA-N Southern Theater Command spokesperson Tian Junli said in a statement that the Chinese military conducted routine patrols in the South China Sea in response to the latest joint patrol.

Tian did not provide further details.

“Such messages are part of their malign influence operations to justify their illegal presence in the country’s exclusive economic zone,” Trinidad said.

The patrol comes after the August 11 collision of a PLA-N warship with a China Coast Guard (CCG) vessel. CCG-3104 was chasing Philippine Coast Guard ship BRP Suluan at high speed when it collided with PLA-N warship No. 164, crushing the CCG ship’s forecastle while four of its crew reportedly went overboard.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Since its effective takeover in 2012, China has enforced what experts call “exclusion zone enforcement” around the Panatag Shoal, outright flouting the 2016 Arbitral Award, which declared the area a traditional fishing ground for the Philippines, China, and Vietnam.

Beijing claims sovereignty over almost the entire South China Sea but the landmark international ruling effectively dismissed this in favor of Manila’s sovereign rights. /cb

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Chinese patrol, PH Navy, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.